tpo 42
The reading passage embraces the idea that Glass is one of the significant building materials widely used in different parts of the world. But, it creates some problems for birds owing to the fact that they cannot discern whether it is glass or not and it causes some injuries. So, there are several methods to address this problem. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author contends that one-way glass should be used because people can see out and birds no longer will be able to see inside the buildings. So, it will diminish the number of injuries. In contrast, the lecturer brings up the idea that this is not the whole story because to bird surface of glass reflect just as a mirror and they are not able to distinguish mirror.
The author also points out that thin strips could be painted on glasses and create a colorful design. So, people can still be able to see through the openings. Conversely, the professor underlines the fact that this method will include some openings and birds will see these openings as a hole, so, they fly into them. If people make the holes smaller, it will make the building too dark.
Finally, as set forth by the author a powerful electromagnet should be installed in buildings because magnetic fields guide birds away from the buildings. On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that birds use magnetic fields only when travel long distances. For instance, when birds fly from a cold weather to a warmer place, magnetic fields help them find the right direction. But in short distances, birds use their eyes and brightness of a light. So, hardly can magnetic fields help birds in long distances.
Having scrutinized all the ideas, a logical conclusion that can be drawn is that there are pieces of evidence ignored by the author while the presence of which could strengthen the author's claim.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, however, if, so, still, then, while, for instance, in contrast, in short, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 335.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81194029851 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36732415563 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525373134328 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0640444791 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8235294118 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.06452816374 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44417924306 0.272083759551 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132764020729 0.0996497079465 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831005744705 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22041929079 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978222865541 0.0443174109184 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.