tpo 42
The material discusses the concept of stopping birds to get injured from the glass building. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely replacing the regular glass with one-way glass. Next, paint the glass with colorful designs, which permit people to see and avoid birds to fly through the glass. Finally, humans could create an artificial magnetic field that helps birds to go in another direction rather than the building.
Conversely, the reading challenges the points, one specific contradiction is the one -way glass could reflex just like a mirror; furthermore, this mirror could reflux the sky or trees, since birds do not understand mirror, they could fly through the glass. In addition to that, the colorfully designed glasses have openings to let people see, so birds could see these openings as holes and fly through them; otherwise, people should design glass with extreme small openings, but the room will be so dark. One final point, birds could use earth magnetic filed just fro traveling long distances; for example, traveling from cold counties to warm countries during the winter. However, they use their eyes and bright light travel short distances. As a result, using a magnetic sense will not have much effect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 565, Rule ID: FOR_FRO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'for'?
Suggestion: for
...rds could use earth magnetic filed just fro traveling long distances; for example, ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, regarding, so, while, for example, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 224.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25446428571 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40478354466 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638392857143 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5456528804 49.2860985944 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.7 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3 7.06452816374 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.490452811976 0.272083759551 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183207261567 0.0996497079465 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10619254806 0.0662205650399 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.321552894239 0.162205337803 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127619883971 0.0443174109184 288% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.