Tpo42
Both the reading and lecture discuss three theories about glass that is used by many architects in modern buildings which is dangerous for wild birds. While the author claims that architects can replace this material with other one that does not harmful for bird, the lecturer disagrees and provides some pieces of evidence to state that these theories do not work at all.
First, the reading says that they can put one way glass that help birds to recognize it. Therefore, it prevents injuries to birds. People who are in building can see through this window but those birds and others can not. However, the speaker disagrees. According to the lecture, these materials reflect everything like mirror. Additionally, birds can not understand mirror. For instance, when they see sky or tree in the mirror they think that they are real. As a result, they make a mistake and hit the glass suddenly.
Secondly, according to the reading passage, it is helpful that paint and color glass with patterns like the general design of building. Consequently, birds would see the strips and keep themselves away to approach to the building. Conversely, the lecturer disapproves this point. He mentions that this theory does not work for them because between these lines there are many holes. So it encourages them to fly through them directly. Moreover, if we make them close together, building will be too dark inside.
Finally, the reading section suggests that, magnetic compass is a good idea to add to glass. Birds have a nature ability to sense earth magnetic areas. They equipped with powerful electromagnets emit magnet signals. Therefore, birds keep themselves away from building. On the other hand, the lecturer rejects this hypothesis. He argues that these kind of animals normally migrate from cold area to warm place over long distances. But they use their eyes and light when they travel city to city.
- TPO-40 - Independent Writing Task Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-34 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.U 76
- TOEFL T P O 31 Integrated Writing Task 90
- TPO-32 - Integrated Writing Task Starting in the 1960s and continuing until the 1980s, sailors in Russian submarines patrolling the North Alantic and Arctic Ocean would occasionally hear strange sounds. These underwater noises reminded the submarine crews 60
- TPO-27 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and ex 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 342, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...rejects this hypothesis. He argues that these kind of animals normally migrate from cold a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, kind of, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 22.412803532 192% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05993690852 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45654447414 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 145.348785872 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605678233438 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 13.0662251656 176% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7292560784 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.7391304348 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7826086957 21.698381199 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08695652174 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.468286311398 0.272083759551 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113226963264 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0789741247038 0.0662205650399 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261859672995 0.162205337803 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626833683153 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 53.8541721854 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.