The lecture disagrees with the passage and denies the reasons have been provided by the reading by following items.
First of all, the teacher do not think the one-way glass is a efficient solution for avoiding birds hurting because he thinks this type of glass acts as a mirror to the birds and they see sky or trees in this glasses and will fly to them according to this fact that they can not percieve mirroring effect.
Secondly, the solotion about colorful windows is not a good idea too because these type of design according to the reading should be some thin stripes which permit birds to see inside of the buildings and this is the main reason of flying to the windows for these species. Teacher says for colorful windows it is needed to make glasses more painted and this resulted in darkness of the rooms which is not suitable for people.
Finally, the magnetic instrument suggestion is inefficient because lecturer provides the scientific proof for that. Birds use the magnetic ability for long distance travelling for example flying from cold areas to warm in order to find south direction and they find their ways in short journeys by eyes and brightness of light so sending magnetic signal will not work for this purpose while the birds do not use this strength.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...acher do not think the one-way glass is a efficient solution for avoiding birds h...
^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... the birds and they see sky or trees in this glasses and will fly to them according ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, while, as to, for example, in short, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 12.0772626932 33% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 223.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77130044843 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31121441659 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582959641256 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 419.366225166 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 21.2450331126 174% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.896740334 49.2860985944 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 177.333333333 110.228320801 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.1666666667 21.698381199 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.1666666667 7.06452816374 215% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405280660085 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164211080447 0.0996497079465 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10069114306 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203817046835 0.162205337803 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111314850696 0.0443174109184 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.3589403974 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.0289183223 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.7273730684 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.498013245 160% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.