The article states that many wild birds get injured because they often cannot distinguish between glass, which is a favored building material, and open air. These injures could be prevented and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor states that these solutions won't be effective to stop hurming birds and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading states that building couldreplace the regular, clear glass with one-way glass that is transparent in only one direction.The professor refutes this point by stating that this type of glass also creates problem. He explains that this glass reflects just like a mirror. According to the professor, the birds are not able to understand reflections. If a bird sees the reflection of tree or sky mirror, it will though that it is a tree or sky but not the mirror.
Second, the article claims that by painting colorful lines or other designs on regular window. People would be able to see through the openings in the design, while birds would see stripes and thus avoid trying to fly through the glass. However, the professor contends that because there is a problem with openings. He explains that birds percieve oponings in the design as a hole and they try to fly through them. In order to prevent injuries holes should be very small, but this would block sunlight and create darkness inside the buildings.
Third, the reading avers that builders could use artificial magnetic field. The lecture opposes this point by saying that birds us magnetic field for navigation only on long distances. On the other hand, for short distances they rely on their eyes, not on a magnetic field. As a result, the magnetic field doesn't help to solve this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...at is transparent in only one direction.The professor refutes this point by stating...
^^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... field. As a result, the magnetic field doesnt help to solve this problem.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, thus, while, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1373.03311258 105% => OK
No of words: 290.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98275862069 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42970371989 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572413793103 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9772538853 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3125 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8125 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.518712361621 0.272083759551 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142139751438 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098844042408 0.0662205650399 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273744646283 0.162205337803 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0945666700198 0.0443174109184 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.