The article states that it is imposible for human to estabilish a colony on Venus and provides three different reasons of support. However, the proffesor explains that people could establish colony there by using floating like ballon in higher atmosphere's layers and solves each of the author's reasons
First, the reading states that pressure on the planet is too hight that may imposible for landing on surface. The professor refutess this point by stating that problem weith presure could be solved. He explains well-known physical fact, that states that in higher layer the pressure is lower than on the surface. On the height of 50 kilometers the atmospheric pressure will be the same as on the Earth and won't creates problems discuseed in reading.
Second, the article claims that there is any source of water and oxygen and people will have to supply them to Venus to support station working. However, the professor contends that. He explains that the atmosphere has carbon, dioxide and sulfuric acid. With different chemical reaction it is posible to obtain water and oxygen on a station. There is no unnessasairly to import them from the Earth.
Third, the reading avers that cloud atmosphere blocks sunlight and reflect it, as a result, there is a little sunlight on the planet's surface. The lecture opposes this point by saying there is enough sunlight for station. He explains that thick atmosphere will be under the station. And will get enough sunlight. Also, station could use reflected sunlight from the cloud. By installing solar panels on top and on buttom the station will acheive more energy to supply their needs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ioxide and sulfuric acid. With different chemical reaction it is posible to obtai...
^^
Line 5, column 401, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sasairly to import them from the Earth. Third, the reading avers that cloud atmo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 271.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06273062731 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43506650619 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527675276753 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.929214688 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.75 110.228320801 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9375 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06452816374 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261909701201 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806860402068 0.0996497079465 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416739539653 0.0662205650399 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143093848936 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402685353772 0.0443174109184 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.