tpo 43 the agnostids
The material discusses how agnostids lived. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely agnostids were free-swimming predators. Next, they might live on the seafloor. Finally, they were parasites.
Conversely, the lecture challenges the points one specific contradiction is, other primitive arthropods were predators because they had large and well-developed eyes; however, agnostids has very tiny and poor eyes, and some of them were completely blind. Thus, in order to be free-swimming predators, they should have other special organs that helped them to catch their pery, but there is no evidence for that. In addition to that, animals that live at the seafloor could not move fast or faraway; moreover, they occupy small geographic area; on the other hand, agnostids were found in multiple geographic areas, which mean that they could move very fast. One final point, parasites' population could not be very large and should stay at certain limit, otherwise they could kill the host that they live on; either way, agnostids had many species population with a vast amount of individulas. Therefore, they could not be parasites.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Firstly
...nts outlined in the reading passage. firstly, the reading details specific points re...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 201.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45273631841 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69240199253 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63184079602 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.3903351076 49.2860985944 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.6 110.228320801 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.6 7.06452816374 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350794089998 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145357694904 0.0996497079465 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559237207357 0.0662205650399 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227349649124 0.162205337803 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909262859231 0.0443174109184 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.