Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss Agnostids. The writer proposes three statements about what agnostids eat and where they live. However, the lecture disagrees with the statements by pointing out sufficient weakness in them.
Firstly, the reading passage claims that agnostids were free-swimming predators. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this statement by providing the evidence that agnostids had small tiny eyes which are not good for them to see a prey. Predators count on clear vision ability to hunt. The lack of vision ability makes agnostids a poor predator. In addition, despite the fact of the lack of vision ability, agnostids must equipped with other type of sense to locate a prey. But no strong evidence is found until now.
Second, the writer says that agnostids lived on the seafloor. Despite the examples of some arthropods living this way, the lecturer argues that agnostids' behaved in a very different way than a seafloor dweller. A seafloor dweller usually swims at a very low speed and stays in a certain place. While agnostids are found in many places which shows that agnostids were able to move in a fast speed within a large area.
Last but not the least, the reading passage suggests that agnostids were parasites. Nevertheless, the lecturer argues that as a parasite the number of agnositds has to be small. A large number of parasites will kill the animal which they live on. However, abundant fossils of agnostids show that obviously agnostids are not parasites.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...low speed and stays in a certain place. While agnostids are found in many places whic...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
...he number of agnositds has to be small. A large number of parasites will kill the animal which th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, well, while, as to, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 251.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0438247012 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55372581369 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569721115538 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.485077756 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.4705882353 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7647058824 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401999895109 0.272083759551 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128669017309 0.0996497079465 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906043376725 0.0662205650399 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238796967193 0.162205337803 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074886498607 0.0443174109184 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.36 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.