TPO 43 integrated.
Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss Agnostids. The writer proposes three statements about what agnostids eat and where they live. However, the lecture disagrees with the statements by pointing out sufficient weakness in them.
Firstly, the reading passage claims that agnostids were free-swimming predators. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this statement by providing the evidence that agnostids had small tiny eyes which are not good for them to see a prey. Predators count on clear vision ability to hunt. The lack of vision ability makes agnostids a poor predator.
Second, the writer says that agnostids lived on the seafloor. Despite the examples of some arthropods living this way, the lecturer argues that agnostids' behaved in a very different way than a seafloor dweller. A seafloor dweller usually swims at a very low speed and stays in a certain place. While agnostids are found in many places which shows that agnostids were able to move in a fast speed within a large area.
Last but not the least, the reading passage suggests that agnostids were parasites. Nevertheless, the lecturer argues that there had to be some vast animals for agnostids to live on or they would just kill the animals. However, there are not a vast amount of fossils found.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...low speed and stays in a certain place. While agnostids are found in many places whic...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 1373.03311258 78% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03286384977 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52591758548 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591549295775 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 419.366225166 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9195138709 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.5714285714 110.228320801 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2142857143 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391500495209 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134835865963 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845382826475 0.0662205650399 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232217719578 0.162205337803 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727824419415 0.0443174109184 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.3 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 63.6247240618 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.