The reading and lecture both are discussed about silver coin that is found and norse settlements. While the reading states that the coin are not a genuine or a fake evidence to mislead the public and provides three reasons to support. However, the professor say that archaeologist don't think that coin is not a fake evidence and The lecture refutes each of the reading points.
Fist of all, the reading claims that the coin are found in native american site in maine but Norse settlement are in canada, more than thousand kilometers distance between this to site. so this to site are not connected to each other. However, the lecture refutes this point by sat that Norse are like to travel fare away place. Norse are travel to north america site and bring coin with them.
In additions, the reading argues this point by no other coin are not found in canadian sites. The reading posit that Norse did not bring any silver coins with them. The lecture counter this point by say that force of north american settlemnts are bring coin with them but when they understand silver coin are useful at europe. So they take all silver coin with them.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that silver coin are not recognize as money in native north american settlement and they understood silver coin are useless to them. The professor refutes this point by saying that norse people are used silver coin as ornament that why norse tread silver coin with them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...r, the professor say that archaeologist dont think that coin is not a fake evidence ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...rse settlement are in canada, more than thousand kilometers distance between this to sit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...lometers distance between this to site. so this to site are not connected to each ...
^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e lecture refutes this point by sat that Norse are like to travel fare away place...
^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'posits'.
Suggestion: posits
...ot found in canadian sites. The reading posit that Norse did not bring any silver coi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'brought'.
Suggestion: brought
... force of north american settlemnts are bring coin with them but when they understand...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 61, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'recognized'.
Suggestion: recognized
...passage argues that silver coin are not recognize as money in native north american settl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...int by saying that norse people are used silver coin as ornament that why norse t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, lastly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 253.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7628458498 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.14342982805 2.5805825403 83% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 145.348785872 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434782608696 0.540411800872 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 373.5 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.750416301 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6923076923 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 7.06452816374 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.529541035429 0.272083759551 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.240165684707 0.0996497079465 241% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105215985473 0.0662205650399 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.370667922735 0.162205337803 229% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0793798695978 0.0443174109184 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.42419426049 82% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 63.6247240618 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.