The reading passage describes possible explanation and claims that the silver coins that were found in the north America is not originally historical evidence. On the contrary, the lecture rebuts that, there are convincing evidence as proof of historical evidence of silver coin founded in North America.
First of all, the writer suggests that, European explorer lived far away from the site where the silver coin actually discovered in North America. According to lecture, although they lived far distance from the Main but they could travel the great distances and it was possible for them to reach the place where silver coin was found.
Second, the author indicates that since no other coins were found in the place of Main it proves that Norse could not bring the silver coin in North America. However, the lecture refutes this idea by saying that, Norse did not lived any place permanently, so when they travel, they bring their all necessary things with them, so that there were no existence of other coin in Main.
Third, the lecture posits that the Norse knew the value of silver coin to the European. So they brought it with them to Europe and can use it for the purpose of trade among European. The lecture also put forward the idea by saying this silver coin was so beautiful and it was very much plausible that Norse could use it as jewelry.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'live'
Suggestion: live
...this idea by saying that, Norse did not lived any place permanently, so when they tra...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, second, so, third, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1132.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 235.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8170212766 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21135798086 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 145.348785872 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502127659574 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 350.1 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.2145097863 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.777777778 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1111111111 21.698381199 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465650887549 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.221362375298 0.0996497079465 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.076926190963 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298337560753 0.162205337803 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471419109674 0.0443174109184 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.3589403974 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 63.6247240618 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.