According to the reading passage, there are three possible reasons to show that the discovered coin is not genuine historical evidence from the people who came from Europe termly Norse. While, the lecturer states that most of the researchers strongly believe that the coin belongs to Norse, subsequently, it is a reasonable historic evidence. Then she provides that there exist three reasons representing that it is not fake.
First, the author claims that the coin has found in the state of Maine in United States where is too far from the first settlement of Norse. On contrary, the professor repudiates it by illustrating that Norse people traveled long distance along the North America and they could have reached far fetched places and many of other objects have found belonging to Norse as the coin.
Second, the texts posits that any other coins has not found in the region.The lecturer, however, opposes it by saying that Norse brought silver coins with themselves to North America and took them back again to Europe. Accordingly, she adds that Norse were not necessarily permanent inhabitants in North America and after they voyage they packed their coins to ship to Europe again.
Third, although the writer claims that Norse understood that silver coins were not valued among Americans, however, the speaker disapproves this by demonstrating that native Americans valued the coins. To put her idea forward, she explains that the silver coins were appealing for the native Americans for their beauty. Consequently, the people liked them for their jewelries like necklaces. Therefore, the European started to trade with them by coins. It shows that the coins were available in North America, too.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fetched places and many of other objects have found belonging to Norse as the coi...
^^
Line 3, column 75, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...other coins has not found in the region.The lecturer, however, opposes it by saying...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, first, however, second, so, then, therefore, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16967509025 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52133954422 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5559566787 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2093569694 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.333333333 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 21.698381199 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.518194752357 0.272083759551 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172126883838 0.0996497079465 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842281548343 0.0662205650399 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295900644095 0.162205337803 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0452569434797 0.0443174109184 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.