According to the reading passage, there are three possible reasons to show that the discovered coin is not genuine historical evidence from the people who came from Europe termly Norse. While, the lecturer founds it not convincing at all and most of the researchers strongly believe that the coin belongs to Norse, subsequently, call it a reasonable historic evidence. Then, the professor provides that there exist three reasons supporting her idea.
First, the author asserts that the coin has found in the state of Maine in United States where is too far from the first settlement of Norse. On contrary, the professor repudiates the declaration by illustrating that Norse people traveled long distance along the North America and they could have reached far-fetched places and many of other objects have found belonging to Norse as the coin.
Second, the text avers that any other coin has not been found in the region. The lecturer, however, opposes the claim by saying that Norse brought silver coins with themselves to North America and took them back again to Europe. Accordingly, Norse were not necessarily permanent inhabitants in North America and packed their coins to ship to Europe again.
Third, although the writer holds the opinion that Norse understood that silver coins were not valued among Americans. Contrarily, the speaker disapproves the assertion by demonstrating that native Americans valued the coins. To put her idea forward, she explains that the silver coins were appealing for the native Americans for their beauty. Consequently, the people liked them for their jewelries like necklaces. Therefore, the European started to trade with them using coins which reveals that the coins were available in North America, too.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, first, however, second, so, then, therefore, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 279.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27956989247 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56697894762 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587813620072 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3494430066 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.307692308 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.547817588192 0.272083759551 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175596764546 0.0996497079465 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0806840325346 0.0662205650399 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309036404566 0.162205337803 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460989886453 0.0443174109184 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.