TPO 45
In this set of materials, the reading passage mentiones the fossil structures found in the United State could not relevent to bees. In constrast, the lecturer cast doubt on the information skepticals present in the reading and refutes them all.
First, the reading passage asserts that the actual bee's fossils did not find. The lecturer challenge this point py saying that, the bee's fossils usually find in tree's resine, in addition, that kind of trees were rare on ancient time and couple years later became widespear. Hence, it is obvious why there were lack of actual bee's fossil.
Second, the reading mentions there are a relation between flowering plants and bees. In history time, there were lack of such planet, as a result, bees did not have food. Conversly, the professor rebuts this point by saying that, bees could feed on other type of plants. Therefore, bees had other type of food to survive.
Finally, the author of the passage discusses lack properties of bee's nest. The lecturer refutes this point bu saying that chemical analysis of water-proof material used in fossil's nest is resemble to modern bee's nest. Thus, it is possible the fossil related to bees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 325, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bees'' or 'bee's'?
Suggestion: bees'; bee's
...s obvious why there were lack of actual bees fossil. Second, the reading mentions t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, second, so, therefore, thus, in addition, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 198.0 270.72406181 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94949494949 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33626122656 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565656565657 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 419.366225166 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8459164286 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.6666666667 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.065875471179 0.272083759551 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0279537669248 0.0996497079465 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0147759513863 0.0662205650399 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0427426136575 0.162205337803 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153978965659 0.0443174109184 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.