Essay topics:
tpo 45
The article states that many skepitics doubt the structures that resemble bee nests were created by bees and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains that the idea mentioned in the article is possible but not convince and refutes each of the auther,s reasons.
First, the reading passage claims that no fossils remains of actual bees. The lecture refutes this claim by states that is true but that is not mean it is not exist because of the preserved of tree sticky liqued.
second, the article makes the argue that absence of flowering plants, the first appeard of the flowering plants on earth 125 milion years ago. However, the lecture counter this point by pointing out that
Votes
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , s
... convince and refutes each of the auther,s reasons. First, the reading passage ...
^^
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
... is true but that is not mean it is not exist because of the preserved of tree sticky...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...the preserved of tree sticky liqued. second, the article makes the argue that absen...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ky liqued. second, the article makes the argue that absence of flowering plants, the f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t absence of flowering plants, the first appeard of the flowering plants on earth...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 30.3222958057 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 592.0 1373.03311258 43% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 119.0 270.72406181 44% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97478991597 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.30283395202 4.04702891845 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21527013979 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 145.348785872 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638655462185 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 171.0 419.366225166 41% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0662251656 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4761265579 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0625434262363 0.272083759551 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290610974605 0.0996497079465 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0170140987171 0.0662205650399 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0400624964528 0.162205337803 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0185490263889 0.0443174109184 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 63.6247240618 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Minimum 150 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.