The reading and lecture both are discussed about old fossils of bees and both part are discussed bees is they exist 200 million years ago or not. While reading stats that some skeptics are doubt about that bees are exist 200 million years ago and they provides three supporting arguments. However, the lecture refutes each of the reading points. The lecture say that bees maybe exist 200 million years ago and skeptics reasons are not convincing.
First of all, the reading stats that no fossils record are not found 200 million years old, earliest fossils are found 100 million years old. However, the lecture are say that 200 millions years older bees body are not preserved because those tree who produce raizan some sticky product that preserve bees fossils, this type of tree very few on that time. So, without this type of tree bees fossils not preserved.
In addition, the reading argue that bees and flowering plant have close relation but flowering plant are not exist 200 millions years ago. Flowering plant are appeared 125 million years ago. However, the professor refutes this points by saying that 200 millions year ago bees may be related to other type of tree. When flower tree appeared than bees make close relation with the flower.
Finally, the reading argues that fossil found in arizona bees nest chamber structure materials are not similar to the modern bees. chambers of modern bees are closed by caps in spiral pattern but in fossil have not such type of caps. The lecture refutes this point by saying that this cap are protect them from water. From the chemical test it proofed that caps of fossil and modern bees caps are same materials.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
... skeptics are doubt about that bees are exist 200 million years ago and they provides...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
...re exist 200 million years ago and they provides three supporting arguments. However, th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the earliest'.
Suggestion: , the earliest
...cord are not found 200 million years old, earliest fossils are found 100 million years old...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...se relation but flowering plant are not exist 200 millions years ago. Flowering plant...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s may be related to other type of tree. When flower tree appeared than bees make clo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Chambers
...als are not similar to the modern bees. chambers of modern bees are closed by caps in sp...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, may, so, while, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86363636364 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.02123610047 2.5805825403 78% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461538461538 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3831203298 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7333333333 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0509856879756 0.272083759551 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0249155916876 0.0996497079465 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0203540483085 0.0662205650399 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0363629656238 0.162205337803 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00948824535971 0.0443174109184 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.42419426049 86% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.