The reading and the speaker discussing about earlier animal size and the factor which contributed to them but in vary contrast ways. The lecturer refutes the all the points made in passage with some evidences.
First, the passage claims that the huge amount of oxygen presented in the past is one reason why the animals are so larger than today because higher the oxygen mean more growth stimulation occurs in the body. That is reason earlier animals are huge and diverse. But, the professor refuses this point by saying that, in the past there were more volcanic activities and there was no chance of getting more oxygen for animal. Further, they might have suffered with breathlessness.
Secondly, the reading suggests that it might have got the plenty of food supply in order grow in larger size. The reason for this idea is, in the past the availability of nutrition was high enough to stimulate growth as well able to next generations. That way it could be became large animals. Again, the lecturer opposes this point by stating that the research reports from the old fossils shows that there were scare in the nutrients. So, it highly impossible for the animal to get rich amount of nutrients in the past.
Thirdly, the passage states that due earth's early climate favour these animals to become larger in size because warmer the climate indicate that, they need not spent their entire energy to keep their body to stay warm. They might have used this energy to be big animals. Still, the speaker rebuts this view by explaining that most of the smaller animals are staying in warmer area of the earth and the loses energy to keep themselves cool-that require lots of energy. So, it does not make any sense- the warmer means more growth.
To sum up, the reading suggests that animal larger in size due to the plenty of oxygen,food and warm climate. But, the speakers refutes all these statements with research evidences and fossil records obtained from the old fossils.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h as well able to next generations. That way it could be became large animals. Ag...
^^
Line 7, column 90, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: larger
... climate favour these animals to become larger in size because warmer the climate indicate tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 403, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'loses'' or 'los's'?
Suggestion: loses'; los's
...ing in warmer area of the earth and the loses energy to keep themselves cool-that req...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 45, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: larger
...um up, the reading suggests that animal larger in size due to the plenty of oxygen,food and wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , food
...rger in size due to the plenty of oxygen,food and warm climate. But, the speakers ref...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 232, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... records obtained from the old fossils.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, well, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 30.3222958057 155% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 340.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84411764706 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26806282905 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535294117647 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2810998443 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8823529412 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 7.06452816374 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390520404116 0.272083759551 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111990491459 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536256792849 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197894344954 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565740587065 0.0443174109184 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.