The reading and the lecture both discuss existance of bees 200 million years ago. The author of the reading advances some hypotheses to explian that bees were not exit 200 million years ago and this is over estimated. Howevere, the lecturer finds all ideas dubious and presents some evidence to repudiate them all. He asserts that it is possible that bees lived 200 million years ago.
First of all, according to the reading the earliest preserved fossil of bees is about 100 million years ago. Conversely, professor in the lecture holds a negative toward this idea and dismisses it. She asserts that the resine which could make a fossil of bees didn't exist at 200 million years ago and no fossil could not be preserved. Moreover, she says that no fossil does not mean that no bees exist.
Furthermore, the writer of the passage casts doubt on existance of bees by pushing forth the idea that bees feed rely almost on flowers which did not exist 200 million years ago. It is contended that the first flowring plants first apeared on Earth 125 millions years ago. In the lecture professor believes that bees feed of the plants which existed 200 million years ago. In addition, she argues that after plant revolution bees feed changed to flowers. As a result, bees were adapted to the plants of 200 million years ago.
Finally, readins notes the sturcture of found fossil is almost different of chambers made by modern bees. It points out the lack of a cap for chambers and claims that this fossiles may be made bu other insects. On the other hand the lecturer totaly disagree with this idea. She cites a recent study which has proved that the fossil material is as the of what modern bees make.
- TPO-35 - Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO 45 Task 1Did bees (a type of insect) exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200- million-year-old fossi 3
- TPO-34 - Integrated Writing Task A huge marine mammal known as Steller’s sea cow once lived in the waters around Bering Island off the coast of Siberia. It was described in 1741 by Georg W. Steller, a naturalist who was among the first Europeans to see 3
- TPO-40 - Integrated Writing Task Many scientists believe it would be possible to maintain a permanent human presence on Mars or the Moon. On the other hand, conditions on Venus are so extreme and inhospitable that maintaining a human presence there would 71
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'exited'.
...ypotheses to explian that bees were not exit 200 million years ago and this is over ...
Line 2, column 260, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...esine which could make a fossil of bees didnt exist at 200 million years ago and no f...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, in addition, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67558528428 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20634414749 2.5805825403 85% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484949832776 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6974433111 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.2352941176 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64705882353 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0619940673903 0.272083759551 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0282203368683 0.0996497079465 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262577241447 0.0662205650399 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0455023019005 0.162205337803 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0110976801153 0.0443174109184 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.2367328918 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.