Both the passage and the listening material are concentrating on whether the electronic databases is better than the traditional paper=based recording keeping. The reading material offers three advantages to support its appoints, however, according to the speaker, all these are not certain.
To begin with, the reading points out that using electronic records can save a lot of money and it doesn't need any space to store. But the professor has a different view. She then argues that this method cannot save money as much as the reading suggests. Due to some legal, though doctors may have made elcetronic records, they have to use paper to record these databases, Thus, it cannot save too much money.
Then, according to the reading, it can reduce the chances of medical errors without improper transcription of data. On the contrary, this is also disagreed by the speaker. In fact, most doctors still use pens to take notes by hands, and then others doctors will translate these records to electronic databases. It means that if there are wrong handwriting, it is possible that these doctors who translate paper records to electronic ones also cannot detect them well. In the end, even they use the electronic databases, the errors also exist.
Moreover, when considering the possibility of aiding research which is supported by the writing material, the speaker also asserts that it is also difficult to deal with. As we all know, people have the private right. So it is impossible for doctors to draw out the information they need if they are not allowed by their patients.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... records can save a lot of money and it doesnt need any space to store. But the profes...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, thus, well, in fact, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04562737643 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63060720403 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585551330798 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9779250408 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7857142857 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368261337207 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109787713764 0.0996497079465 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920119534594 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199387699205 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833526183584 0.0443174109184 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.