tpo 47
The reading and the lecture both discuss Paleontologists have long wondered whether large pterosaurs were capable of powered flight or whether they were able only to glide.
On the first hand, the reading states that there are several arguments have been made against powered flight.
On the other hand, the lecture refutes this, by saying that the Pterosaurs were cabable of powred flight.
First of all, the reading clearly claims that since modern reptiles are cold-blooded, ancient reptiles such as pterosaurs were probably cold-blooded as well so pterosaurs would not have been able to generate the energy needed to fly. However, the lecture argues that Pterosaurs have a warm blood because it has a skin covering by a hiar. Furthermore, the professor sattes that consequently this hair makes it is blood has high-tempreture.
In addition, the reading makes the argument is that some Pterosaurs have probably so heavy that they would not have been able to flap their wings fast enough to stay aloft for any length of time.
The lecture argues this point by stating that Pterosaurs have a holo bones which make them weight low nough to stay aloft for any length of time.
Lastly, the reading a really argues that all animals absolutely with powered flight are able to take off from the ground. The lecture definitely counter this claim by pointing out that Pterosaurs use four legs to jump because they walk on the land by using four legs, not like birds which walk using on the land using tow legs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, lastly, really, so, well, in addition, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96078431373 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46384389126 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537254901961 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.572094649 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 110.228320801 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 21.698381199 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 7.06452816374 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.09492273731 171% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.526464898152 0.272083759551 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20870684215 0.0996497079465 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131065962253 0.0662205650399 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251263212948 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105423507296 0.0443174109184 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.