TPO 47
The reading and the lecture both are about an ancient kind of reptiles that was able to fly. The writer of the passage do not agree on these idea and uses 3 reasons to reveal the problems related to the matter. However, the lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. He is of the opinion that may pterosaurs were capable to fly.
First of all, the reading argues about being cold-blooded animal which are not able to fly due to the fewer energy that they have in thier body. In contrast, The lecturer uses information of new discoveries that exposed dense covering body of fair and hair of the pterosaurs which assist them to gain energy and save it easier that other cold-blooded reptiles.
Secondly, according to the text, pterosaurs were big and overweighted animals that concluded to issues to start a flight. On the other hand, the Professor explain about the light weight and hollow bones of pterosaurs which was a possibility to them to begin flying.
Third, The passage showed results of weak and small muscles of pterosaurs to allow them to jump into the air. Conversely, the lecturer stands on differences between pterosaurs and other birds at the time of starting to lunch to the air. these specific bird walks on the limbs to push his weight on the ground. Thus it had no troubles to jump into the air.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this idea' or 'these ideas'?
Suggestion: this idea; these ideas
...e writer of the passage do not agree on these idea and uses 3 reasons to reveal the proble...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: LIGHT_WEIGHT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lightweight'?
Suggestion: lightweight
...r hand, the Professor explain about the light weight and hollow bones of pterosaurs which wa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...e time of starting to lunch to the air. these specific bird walks on the limbs to pus...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 311, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...limbs to push his weight on the ground. Thus it had no troubles to jump into the air...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thus, in contrast, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67948717949 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4805621725 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559829059829 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9888875168 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.25 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4166666667 7.06452816374 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267717039067 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896424959237 0.0996497079465 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060894389088 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148232593487 0.162205337803 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168004909532 0.0443174109184 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.3589403974 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 63.6247240618 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.