The reading and the lecture, they both discuss the declination of frog species. While the reading offers various possible solutions for this problem, the lecture refutes this saying that the solutions offered by reading do not any practical significance.
First of all, the reading claims that the frogs are harmed by the pesticides that are used in a farm to prevent crops from the harmful insects ultimately harms the frog, so this kind of uses should reduce. However, the lecture argues that the practice of reducing such pesticide is not economically practical. Moreover, the professor states that it would cause an extreme disadvantage that may cause loose in the crops.
In addition, the reading makes the argument that fungus that has spread all around the world is next factor for declination of frog number which can be solved by using the antifungal on a large scale. The lecture counter's this point by stating this kind of treatment is extremely difficult to use on an individual frog. According to the professor, it is very expensive and nearly impossible to treat repeatedly for every generation of the frog.
Lastly, the reading passage argues that Natural habitat of frog are threatened by excessive use of water resources which should be a limit in use to protect the frog species from extinction. The lectures refute this claim by pointing out that this kind of activities has not the threat to habitat. Moreover, the professor says that this kind of activities has caused global warming.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...er resources which should be a limit in use to protect the frog species from extinc...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, lastly, may, moreover, so, while, in addition, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1265.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62065945899 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.080277339 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06452816374 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3465621331 0.272083759551 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138339107979 0.0996497079465 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121086688441 0.0662205650399 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223552820035 0.162205337803 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789312149107 0.0443174109184 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.