The reading passage claims that frogs hep people for protecting humans by eating disease-carrying insects.Several methods have been proposed to solved the problem of declining frog population. However, the lecture casts serious doubt on this claim by presenting some counter arguments and examples. She believes that There is propose in the passage there are not practical. it is not useful and positive solution.
First of all, she argues that pesticides have reduced cannot economic due to if farmer follow this rule has many disadvantage effect for another area this is competitive among farmers. This, However, in contrast to the reading passage frogs are being harmed by pesticides, which are chemicals used to prevent insects from damaging farm crops such as corn and sugarcane. The farmers using harmful pesticides near sensitive frog population, it would significantly reduce the harm pesticides cause to frogs.
Moreover, it is noted to the passage that a second major factor in frog population decline is fungus that has spread around the world with deadly effect. the fungus causes thickening of the skin and since frogs use their skin to absorb water, influence frog die. antifungal medication and treatments that kill fungus with heat. in contrast in the lecture clearly states that this plane about fungus use in diffrent capture. this might treat population. this is not protect but with use this way it should produce new generation but this is expensive.
Finally, the speakers points out that water are using in wetland is not safe people use water and have global heat and spread all world human have to use water and this way change ecosystem. Nevertheless, the text asserts that natural habitats are threatened eggs in water are dependent on water and wetland so human activity damage egg's frag. but this is not suitable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Several
...mans by eating disease-carrying insects.Several methods have been proposed to solved th...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 327, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'proposed'.
Suggestion: proposed
...nd examples. She believes that There is propose in the passage there are not practical....
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...in the passage there are not practical. it is not useful and positive solution. ...
^^
Line 4, column 155, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ad around the world with deadly effect. the fungus causes thickening of the skin an...
^^^
Line 4, column 264, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Antifungal
...in to absorb water, influence frog die. antifungal medication and treatments that kill fun...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 329, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
... treatments that kill fungus with heat. in contrast in the lecture clearly states ...
^^
Line 4, column 332, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...eatments that kill fungus with heat. in contrast in the lecture clearly states that this...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 425, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...e about fungus use in diffrent capture. this might treat population. this is not pro...
^^^^
Line 4, column 454, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...t capture. this might treat population. this is not protect but with use this way it...
^^^^
Line 4, column 466, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'protected'.
Suggestion: protected
...his might treat population. this is not protect but with use this way it should produce...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 345, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...and so human activity damage eggs frag. but this is not suitable.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, in contrast, such as, first of all, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 299.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18060200669 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63048953118 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588628762542 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.3659915197 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8125 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.485202178555 0.272083759551 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14685498705 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133700739135 0.0662205650399 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281132477819 0.162205337803 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521668208371 0.0443174109184 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.