TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems

Essay topics

In this paper, the writer proposes three methods to solve the problem of the decline frog populations. On the contrary, the speaker thinks none of these methods is practical.

To begin with, according to the writer, the laws prohibited farmers from using harmful pesticides can reduce the harm of pesticides. However, the speaker points out that it is not economical fair for farmers who live near the frogs. Because if they have to follow stricter regulations, they cannot compet with other farmers who do not live near the frogs. And they will have lose more crops and have a lower yield.

Then, as the passage says, the treat to skin infection of fungus is a useful way which the speaker has a different view that it has many problems. People have to treat each frog individually in a large scale which is really difficult. What's more, if they pass the fungus onto their babies, people have to treat them again and again. With so many problems, the second way is in fact a useless solution.

In the end, the passage shows that protecting lakes and marshes from excessive water use and development is helpful. This also cannot save frogs, because the real biggest reason is the globe warming not the excessive use. So this is also unlikely to save frogs by reducing water use and development.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'lost'.
Suggestion: lost
...live near the frogs. And they will have lose more crops and have a lower yield. T...
^^^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
... large scale which is really difficult. Whats more, if they pass the fungus onto thei...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, really, second, so, then, in fact, on the contrary, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1080.0 1373.03311258 79% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77876106195 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40010702766 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588495575221 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1198311531 49.2860985944 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 83.0769230769 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3846153846 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367592426477 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114039286388 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0649718038742 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189437502941 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284470673862 0.0443174109184 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.