The main idea of both the reading passage and the lecture is about the problem of reducing frog populations. The reading passage provide three reasons for solving this problem. On the other hand, the professor rejects whatever mentioned in the passage.
First, the reading passage discusses chemicals used by farmers to prevent insects from damaging their crops which this chemical is harm to frogs. The passage suggests that laws must forbid using of this chemicals. Nevertheless, the professor refutes this point and states that it cannot be done economically because farmers are relying on pesticides for high yield. The professor adds that if farmers stop using pesticides they lose more crop and cannot compete in the market with other regions.
Second, the reading passage discusses treatment of frogs. On the other hand, the professor rejects this point and states that this treatment must be performed on each frog individually. The professor adds that the treatment would be expensive and it must be repeated for the next generation of frogs.
Eventually, the reading passage discusses that frogs' natural habitats are endangered which caused by human activities. But, the professor is against this point and states that the biggest threat is global warming which cause frogs to being extinct.
All in all, the reading passage provides three reasons to solve the problem of reducing frog populations. On the other hand, the professor thinks that none of these is reasonable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...suggests that laws must forbid using of this chemicals. Nevertheless, the professor ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30801687764 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54519580476 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489451476793 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 368.1 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1486961169 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8571428571 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9285714286 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21428571429 7.06452816374 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211236527827 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820676248292 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577020714272 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132103689708 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433605748197 0.0443174109184 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.