The main idea of both the reading passage and the lecture is about stricter regulations for using and storing coal ash. The reading passage provides three reasons of support. On the other hand, the professor rejects whatever mentioned in the passage.
First, the reading passage discusses that environmental regulations already exist. Nevertheless, the professor refutes this point and states that current regulations are not adequate. New regulations must provide for new company along with the old one in this field because their disposal of coal ash cause pollution the drinking water.
Second, the reading passage demonstrates that new regulations may discourage the recycling of coal ash. On the other hand, the professor rejects this point and gives us an example of Mercury. She states that Mercury is also a hazard material for environment and there are some regulations for its uses but Mercury’s consumers do not have any concerns about the regulations.
Eventually, the reading passage claims that new regulations will result in a substantial increase of costs for the power companies. But the professor is against this point and states that the cost for power will increases only one percent and it definitely worth to save our environment and to avoid the environmental pollution.
All in all, the reading passage provides three reasons against the stricter regulations for using and storing coal ash. On the other hand, the professor thinks that none of these is reasonable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'increase'
Suggestion: increase
...and states that the cost for power will increases only one percent and it definitely wort...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, may, nevertheless, second, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32911392405 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82281949863 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506329113924 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 388.8 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6589420848 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1538461538 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2307692308 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385118653136 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141754522599 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113406450897 0.0662205650399 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23383806797 0.162205337803 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477963616481 0.0443174109184 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.