To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
It is undeniable that the amount of professors's salaries is a popular topic which has caused heated debate in a long period of time because it affects everybody in his or her daily lives. Depending on personal experience, personality type, and emotional concern, people differ greatly in their attitudes toward this issue. As far as I am concerned, I agree with this statement that rising professors's salaries may enhance the quality of education. In the following, I will try to explain the specific reasons which I think are the most common viewpoints nowadays.
To begin with, I strongly believe that nowadays universities have a significant effect on society because they help people getting prepare for accepting responsibility in their carrier future. For doing so, universities must pay more attention to professors who has the most critical duty for transforming their knowledge to students. It is obvious that if professors do not face financial problems, they can do their best. In contrast, if professors's mind be full of financial problems they can not focus on their teaching job and consequently the quality of education will decrease. Thus, it seems that rising professors's salaries benefit at least for our society.
For another, these days people attend university more that the past, so the universities need many professors who can run the class and keep the universities alive. On other hand, being a professor in an university may seem a low paid job. In order to persuade students to continue their educational life and gain a doctoral degree, universities can increase professors's salaries, In contrast, if universities deal with the lack of enough professors, they may increase working hours of the professors, which without any doubt, will lead to lowering the quality of education.
To sum up, by taking into account all the above factors, we may reach the conclusion that rising the professors's salaries can enhance the quality of education due to attraction of graduated students to consider teaching in the university and lacking of financial problems of professors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...hich has caused heated debate in a long period of time because it affects everybody in his or ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 668, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aries benefit at least for our society. For another, these days people attend u...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... For another, these days people attend university more that the past, so the un...
^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ve. On other hand, being a professor in an university may seem a low paid job. In ...
^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...id job. In order to persuade students to continue their educational life and gain...
^^
Line 5, column 578, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to lowering the quality of education. To sum up, by taking into account all th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, if, may, so, thus, at least, i think, in contrast, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1784.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 337.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29376854599 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96869999375 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572700296736 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.1400402086 48.9658058833 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.230769231 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9230769231 20.6045352989 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290028497961 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967894175508 0.076458572812 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813409079535 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174056923323 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891492590342 0.0645574589148 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.