TPO 48 In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for e
Actually, both the passage and the lecture comment about the extinctions of some types of frogs and the decrease of the number of other frogs which causes many deleterious consequences. Although the passage brings three theories for diminishing some negative points that lead frogs to encounter such issues, the lecturer puts those hypothesizes under question. According to the professor's statement, none of the suggested methods are practical enough.
First of all, as illustrated by the article, enacting legislation in order to eliminate the pesticides which are used by farmers to omit the pest of the farms' plants. Distribution such pesticides in surrounding lands where frogs settled, adversely influence frogs’ life span. The orator; however, refutes the expression by emphasizing the fact that this rule isn't economically fair because many farmers, who their lands locate adjacent frogs’ houses, will lose their income and revenue.
Second, as declared in the writing, deadly funguses which have dispersed in all four corners of the world should be treated so as to improve the dehydration problem of frogs. Nonetheless, the speaker rebuts the claim by stating the thought that not only is it an expensive solution but it also is so sophisticated that can't be done for each individual frogs. He elaborates on this claim that it needs to continue for the next generations as well.
Finally, the penman indicates that for preserving the natural habitats especially lakes and marshes, where frogs’ eggs are conserved and grown, from human's negative effects, people should be restricted. Although the professor believes that it is an appropriate idea, he dismisses the idea by adding the fact that the most significant factor that threatens the environment is global warming. Hence, this way isn't counted as a useful suggestion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 379, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...esizes under question. According to the professors statement, none of the suggested method...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... by emphasizing the fact that this rule isnt economically fair because many farmers,...
^^^^
Line 9, column 125, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... corners of the world should be treated so as to improve the dehydration problem of frog...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 320, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...on but it also is so sophisticated that cant be done for each individual frogs. He e...
^^^^
Line 13, column 413, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ment is global warming. Hence, this way isnt counted as a useful suggestion.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, nonetheless, second, so, well, as to, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 289.0 270.72406181 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45674740484 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87355607309 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636678200692 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8398219902 49.2860985944 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.416666667 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303139627924 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920168395684 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720233090517 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158874317027 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0604062593008 0.0443174109184 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.3589403974 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.2367328918 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.42419426049 121% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 63.6247240618 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.