TPO 49

Essay topics:

TPO 49

In this set of materials the reading passage discusses that several reasons and evidence that shows that Whalse navigate using stars. While in the listening the professor casts doubts on what is presented in the text and believes that this reasons are fasinating but they are not convencing.

First of all, in the text it is clearly mentioned that the Whales are intelligent animals with well developed cognitive ability to use complex stimuli like sky for orientation. However, the porfessor claims that there is not a real conection between intelligent andusing stars for nagigation. For example, other animals used stars for navigation for intence birds and dogs, but birds are not very intelligent and the dogs have average intelligent. Thus the conection betwween intelligent and navigation is not reasonable. And dogs do this because of another reason not their intelligent.

In addition, the professor disagrees with this idea that becuase the Whales migrate in straight lines so they used an external force for navigation and this is the stars. He says that the external force is magnetic feild not stars. The Whales have a magnetied in their body and they used it for navigation using Earth magnetic feild.

Finally, in the text it is stated that humpback Whales do spy-hopping behavior and they do it for looking at the upward and watching the sky and stars. The professor subscribes that other animals like shraks do spy-hopping but they did not this behavior for navigation because they do not migrate and they do spy-hopping for hunting and find prey. And it is possible that the humpback whales doing spy-hopping for the same reason.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... and the dogs have average intelligent. Thus the conection betwween intelligent and ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, look, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 7.30242825607 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09926470588 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65848992165 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463235294118 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 424.8 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0115638381 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.692307692 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430941618297 0.272083759551 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161593129487 0.0996497079465 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103827034929 0.0662205650399 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247150920049 0.162205337803 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962680379184 0.0443174109184 217% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.