The lecture particularly deals with its objections against the theories given in the passage for long distance migration of humpback whales. According to the passage, there are three possible theories how whales migrate by navigating with the help of stars. While the lecture completely disagrees with them placing forth its possible reasons.
First, the lecture ascribes the fact that there is no real connection between the intelligence and use of stars for navigation. For an instance, although ducks are average intelligent, they even migrate using stars. Therefore, it does not show any connection of intelligence and stars as they work with instinct they are born with. This rejects the first theory of the passage.
Second, most of the animals are seem to sense external force while migration. In the same way, humpback whales also possess biomagnetite because of which they are sensitive to earth magnetic field. Thus, they travel the straight line or whatever due to the magnetic field rather than stars. This rejects the second theory of the passage.
Third, floating straight up inorder to see the stars for navigation is not convincing theory. Spy hopping is usually done by sharks for hunting rather than migration. They look sky in the day when there is no star. So, it is just a pure speculation for whales to migrate by navigating by the help of stars. This rejects the third theory of the passage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e by navigating with the help of stars. While the lecture completely disagrees with t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'seemed'.
Suggestion: seemed
...age. Second, most of the animals are seem to sense external force while migration...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, look, second, so, therefore, third, thus, while, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 234.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08547008547 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57679196276 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57264957265 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 8.23620309051 24% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.871600225 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.375 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.625 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 7.06452816374 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.37289520985 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111502963509 0.0996497079465 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061607227071 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217977116516 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338002593958 0.0443174109184 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.65 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.