In the given sets of materials, the main topic is the validity of different theories which were mentioned about "great house" of Chaco Canyon" in New Mexico. While the author has acknowledged one of the following hypothesis was the use of stone house, the speaker cast doubt on these points by providing justifications.
The first points in the article is that since the structure of Chao house was alike with the "apartment building" used as home, it might be a previous version of this architecture based on its appearance.. However, this was questioned by the lecturer as he stated that despite of exterior resemblance, the inside view was not accommodated with enough fire place for its residents.
Moreover, according to essay, Choco was a food storage due to clear evidence revealed that the large spaces has paved the ways for reservation foods without being spoiled. Nevertheless, the speaker discussed that this assumption had some flaws. Based his claim, if it used as a storage why any excavation did not support this possibility.
Last but not least, the writer has mentioned that the purposes of using this houses was for ceremonial means. According to ancient mound of consisting a huge amount of pots, people accumulated for various ceremony. After being served in this pots, they would discard them in that region. Conversely, according to the professor this mound built when constructors abandoned the surplus of their materials such as sand and stones.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...his architecture based on its appearance.. However, this was questioned by the lec...
^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...various ceremony. After being served in this pots, they would discard them in that r...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'while', 'as for', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.26523297491 0.261695866417 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.164874551971 0.158904122519 104% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0681003584229 0.0723426182421 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0286738351254 0.0435111971325 66% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0322580645161 0.0277247811725 116% => OK
Prepositions: 0.154121863799 0.128828473217 120% => OK
Participles: 0.0681003584229 0.0370669169778 184% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.97836878194 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0143369175627 0.0208969081088 69% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.125448028674 0.128158765124 98% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00716845878136 0.0158828679856 45% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.010752688172 0.0114777025283 94% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1504.0 1645.83664459 91% => OK
No of words: 241.0 271.125827815 89% => OK
Chars per words: 6.24066390041 6.08160592843 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04852973271 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.348547717842 0.374372842146 93% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.273858921162 0.287516216867 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.207468879668 0.187439937562 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.165975103734 0.113142543107 147% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97836878194 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655601659751 0.539623497131 121% => OK
Word variations: 73.9611403202 53.8517498576 137% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 21.9090909091 21.7502111507 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3772069336 49.3711431718 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.727272727 132.220823453 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 21.7502111507 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 49.2949830253 50.5018328374 98% => OK
Elegance: 2.15873015873 1.90840788429 113% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.105612013906 0.142949733639 74% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.078798022411 0.0787303798458 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.596253024902 0.631733273073 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.156682653823 0.139662658121 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.321508198505 0.414875509568 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0882873484598 0.0530846634433 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 0.0 3.49668874172 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.