The following appeared in a letter from a department chairperson to the president of Pierce University. "Some studies conducted by Bronston College, which is also located in a small town, reveal that both male and female professors are happier living in

Recently, the chairperson of Bronston College suggests a recommendation for Pierce University that is both of them located in the small town. Regarding to this issue, the author of the argument concludes that those professors who their spouses are working in the same geological area have a happier life style. He presents some evidence to suggest this is valid including the improvement of morale of entire staff. Even though the underlying issue may have merits, because of lack of relevant evidence, unaddressed assumptions, and vague terminology, the author's argument is unsubstantiated and deeply flawed.
The first point and the most important one is that the research done by Bronston College should not be generalized to the Pierce University. The only thing that is common between Bronston College and Pierce University is their location. In fact, being in the small town is not a cogent reason to conclude that this study will work for that university. The author has completely forgotten to mention other attributes like reputation or their rate of students or other characteristics which make this two institutions similar. Hence, lack of logical reasons to attribute these institution akin make this argument with lots of loopholes.
The other problem with this argument relates to the vague language. According to the editorial, the author cites that if both female and male professors are employing in the same university, they are "happier". The author does not elucidate that in which aspect, they are happier or how this feeling has been evaluated. Moreover, there is a possibility if both spouses are employing in the same university in a mega city, possibly they have the same emotion and feeling. In fact, the argument is not that clear. If the author has mentioned that because of fresh and peaceful environment of small city or due to the less air pollution or other problems seen in large city, the professors have high level of satisfaction, the argument can be more compelling and cogent.
One more thing is that the author has forgotten to cite the Pierce competing advantages, which can absorb more talent spouses. In fact, the argument should notice why new professors with their spouses might choose this university and not going to the higher rank universities like Harvard or MIT. To illustrate more, the author of this editorial can express some benefits of being hired by the Pierce University like the better living condition, higher salary and to name but a few. However, he does not consider any above reasons and mentions that the money that spent in this way would be logical. Not surprisingly, in this situation just a few professor might accept this offer and will work in this small town and the money would be wasted.
In Conclusion, the authors in this argument can not provide enough and impressive reasons to support his claims. Even though the author might present some real fact, his wrong generalization of Bronston College to the Pierce University makes it invalidate. Moreover, some other attribution should be mentioned to support other's author claim about the similarity between these two institutions and the new professors' tendencies to apply for the Pierce University.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 556, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...assumptions, and vague terminology, the authors argument is unsubstantiated and deeply ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 569, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this institution' or 'these institutions'?
Suggestion: this institution; these institutions
...e, lack of logical reasons to attribute these institution akin make this argument with lots of lo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, as for, in conclusion, in fact

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 11.1786427146 197% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 13.6137724551 125% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 28.8173652695 149% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 55.5748502994 112% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 16.3942115768 146% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2715.0 2260.96107784 120% => OK
No of words: 526.0 441.139720559 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16159695817 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.78901763229 4.56307096286 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85062400068 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 204.123752495 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460076045627 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 858.6 705.55239521 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 15.0 8.76447105788 171% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.22255489022 213% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7990597637 57.8364921388 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.043478261 119.503703932 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8695652174 23.324526521 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.70786347227 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152426072938 0.218282227539 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512304900186 0.0743258471296 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594743738294 0.0701772020484 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944191132101 0.128457276422 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245159946462 0.0628817314937 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.5979740519 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.32208582834 102% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 98.500998004 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.