In the given sets of audio materials, the main topic center on whether the salvage logging, the process of cleaning forest after catastrophes like fire or typhoon, was beneficial or not. While the author has focused on the advantage of this trend, the speaker in the follow-up material cast doubt on them by providing justification as long-term effects.
The first point mentioned in the article is that this strategy would help new plants to be flourished as the remnants removed. However, this was questioned by the lecturer as she stated that the nutrition driven from the dead trees was suitable and paved the way for burgeoning new plants.
Moreover, according to the essay, the decaying wood allowed insects and other harmful species to grow which posed a threat on the health of forest. Nonetheless, the speaker has asserted that in similar observation an animal such as bark beetle not only was beneficial but also provided a better environment for living other species.
Last but not least, the writer has noted that salvage logging has played a critical role in economic boom such as providing job opportunity or raw material for wood-based industry. Conversely, according to the professor, these opportunities were temporal. As a matter of fact, this strategy required some expensive measures like helicopter or enrolling outsiders who were expert in these field not local habitats.
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'conversely', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'while', 'such as', 'as a matter of fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.246963562753 0.261695866417 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.161943319838 0.158904122519 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.113360323887 0.0723426182421 157% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0445344129555 0.0435111971325 102% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0080971659919 0.0277247811725 29% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.145748987854 0.128828473217 113% => OK
Participles: 0.0769230769231 0.0370669169778 208% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.74553510913 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0161943319838 0.0208969081088 77% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.133603238866 0.128158765124 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00404858299595 0.0158828679856 25% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0080971659919 0.0114777025283 71% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1402.0 1645.83664459 85% => OK
No of words: 226.0 271.125827815 83% => OK
Chars per words: 6.20353982301 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04852973271 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.393805309735 0.374372842146 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.309734513274 0.287516216867 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.238938053097 0.187439937562 127% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.146017699115 0.113142543107 129% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74553510913 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654867256637 0.539623497131 121% => OK
Word variations: 72.0848136591 53.8517498576 134% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 25.1111111111 21.7502111507 115% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4424141133 49.3711431718 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.777777778 132.220823453 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 21.7502111507 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 0.878197800319 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 56.0845624385 50.5018328374 111% => OK
Elegance: 2.18867924528 1.90840788429 115% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.567276823075 0.549887131256 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.145706600126 0.142949733639 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0667884689481 0.0787303798458 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.671985878541 0.631733273073 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.144653295661 0.139662658121 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.261140947845 0.266732575781 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116887311406 0.103435571967 113% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.304126260261 0.414875509568 73% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0737249672251 0.0530846634433 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.366677330035 0.40443939384 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791622161877 0.0528353158467 150% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.26048565121 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 4.0 10.2958057395 39% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.