In the given set of materials, the main topic has centered on whether ethanol fuel, produced by plants, is a proper alternative for gasoline or not. While the author has focused on its demerits, the speaker in the follow-up material cast doubt on those points in a number of ways.
The first point mentioned in the article is that global warming remained as an unsolved crisis due to the emission of greenhouse gas even by using ethanol fuel. However, according to the orator, since the ethanol fuel required flourishing corns and other plants, it might compensate the amount of carbon dioxide's devastating aftermaths.
Moreover, according to the essay, the amount of animals' food resource declined drastically since a large portion of their foods exploited as the ethanol fuel. Conversely, this was questioned by the lecturer as he stated that "cellulose", the main ingredient for producing ethanol fuel, was not eaten by animals. Hence, their food source would not change.
Last but not least, the writer has asserted that due to the tax subsidies which was allocated to the ethanol producers, it seemed cost-effective option, otherwise it would not be. Nonetheless, the speaker discussed that when more people tended to use this kind of energy, its production increased. Consequently, the price would decreased up to even 40 percent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 329, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'decrease'
Suggestion: decrease
...ncreased. Consequently, the price would decreased up to even 40 percent.
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'conversely', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'moreover', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'while', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.265873015873 0.261695866417 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.150793650794 0.158904122519 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0634920634921 0.0723426182421 88% => OK
Adverbs: 0.047619047619 0.0435111971325 109% => OK
Pronouns: 0.031746031746 0.0277247811725 115% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126984126984 0.128828473217 99% => OK
Participles: 0.0674603174603 0.0370669169778 182% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.97909070325 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0277777777778 0.0208969081088 133% => OK
Particles: 0.00396825396825 0.00154638098197 257% => OK
Determiners: 0.111111111111 0.128158765124 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.015873015873 0.0158828679856 100% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00793650793651 0.0114777025283 69% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1355.0 1645.83664459 82% => OK
No of words: 217.0 271.125827815 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.24423963134 6.08160592843 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04852973271 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.391705069124 0.374372842146 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.308755760369 0.287516216867 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.216589861751 0.187439937562 116% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.142857142857 0.113142543107 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97909070325 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635944700461 0.539623497131 118% => OK
Word variations: 66.5965176598 53.8517498576 124% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 21.7 21.7502111507 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2700801897 49.3711431718 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.5 132.220823453 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 21.7502111507 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.1 0.878197800319 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 52.5755760369 50.5018328374 104% => OK
Elegance: 2.0 1.90840788429 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.687157296841 0.549887131256 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.132273434365 0.142949733639 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0743070667152 0.0787303798458 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.645493188005 0.631733273073 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.157756886402 0.139662658121 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.317290236225 0.266732575781 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123872431952 0.103435571967 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.344604237634 0.414875509568 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0345826168429 0.0530846634433 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.478308305366 0.40443939384 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480519454043 0.0528353158467 91% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 10.2958057395 97% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.