The function of science is to reassure; the purpose of art is to upset. Therein lies the value of each.

Not surprisingly, both art and science have long been the cornerstone of every human society. People have different perception toward the purpose of the art and science. While some believe that the function of science is to reassure and on the other side, the art causes ennui, Some are of the opinion that they are wrong. To the best of my knowledge, both of them can have some positive advantages, that in some occasions these functions might be reversed.

The first point springs to mind is that advances in technology and science can pave the human's way for better life style and help them to improve their level of thoughts and living conditions. To begin with, the advances in telecommunication devices that allow people to be in touch with each other regardless of how far they are. Due to modern technologies and applications like What's app or Skype, any individuals can keep in touch with their families and friends without any restriction based on the geological distances. Moreover, advances in medicines and clinical equipment help people to be save from any noxious and harmful disease. As an example, last few decades, large number of people have lost their lives because of contagious disease and lack of sanitized tools and equipment. However, nowadays the increasing number of hospitals and their modern and new facilities that are available to help patients can be regarded as the most important factor in science for its reassurance function in every body's life.

On the negative side, it should be noted that art is not always helpful to boost the level of human society. In fact, in some inventions like atomic bomb or some addicted pills( industrial pills) are the negative advances in science. To clarify this issue, it is clear that atomic bomb in Japan not only caused a lot of injuries but also the harmful effect lasted for a long time after Hiroshima bombardment. Many Japanese died and most of other people that lived there had majors disease like cancers. Additionally, the harmful and detected pills like weed or and other hazardous substances cause young people to be addicted and have long lasting disease with never-improved effect.

This issue is correct for art function. In fact, art is the same as the science and simultaneously can have negative or positive function. First, some kinds of the art in different forms like movies, music or other types like writing or even reading a book can assuage human's pain. For example, listening to the Beethoven or Mozart's songs can calm down us and make us so relax. Admittedly, watching some kinds of film like "Shaw shank redemption" can motivate you and encourage you to be hopeful. In fact, these kind of art reminds people never give up. However, some other movies and kinds of art or music push us to think deeply and make us depressed. To illustrate, some famous painting about poverty or human' obstacles or social problems might upset us, but it seems absurd if we say all kinds of art cause people unhappiness.

From what have been discussed, it is obvious that every coin has two sides. Developments in science and medicines or other fields have brought about different advantages to human society. Conversely, sometimes these benefits might act reversely and threaten human lives. Art also can be regarded as an entity that have the same role as science. In some occasions it can inspire human and sometimes it upsets you.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...dern technologies and applications like Whats app or Skype, any individuals can keep ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 517, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...d encourage you to be hopeful. In fact, these kind of art reminds people never give up. Ho...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in fact, kind of, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 39.0 14.8657303371 262% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2857.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 578.0 442.535393258 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94290657439 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90322654589 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64918215492 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487889273356 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 908.1 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1453310925 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.035714286 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13749618115 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459291260318 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504518732196 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840858484804 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545313608267 0.0667264976115 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.