The lecture state that, sending people to asteroids is the best choice for colonization on space. Conversely, the professor believes that this is not practical and offers three counter-arguments to demonstrate weaknesses of each presumption.
The first paragraph of the reading explains that low gravity makes the landing process easier. In contrast, the profess thinks that this might make landing easier, but it can cause serious health risks. People lose their muscle mass when they are exposed to low gravity circumastances, as astronaunts did. Prolonged exposure to this condition made very bad effects on astronaunt. This directly contradicts the first assumption mentioned in the text.
There are lots of lucrative metals in the astroids and mining them can provide required fundings for the space travel, asserts the next paragraph. The speaker on the other hand mentions that mining astroids might provide some precious metals, but there is no guarantee that this metals stay expensive when they are available frequently on the earth. if its price decrease, there is not money for to support the projects. Again he disproves another conjecture.
The final portion of the reading passage talks about accessibility of astroids and says that it is not needed to go far ways like the Moon or Mars. The lecturer rejects this theory and emphasizes that maybe astroids are near to earth in a span of time, but they are moving and after a wile they will move away and there is no way to bring back people on there.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , sending
The lecture state that,sending people to asteroids is the best choice ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...he landing process easier. In contrast, the profess thinks that this might make landing eas...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... metals, but there is no guarantee that this metals stay expensive when they are ava...
^^^^
Line 5, column 351, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... are available frequently on the earth. if its price decrease, there is not money ...
^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s. Again he disproves another conjecture The final portion of the reading passage...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, may, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11646586345 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74032753695 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622489959839 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8984385193 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.166666667 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.