The text states that pterosaurs; which lived with dinosaurs was very enormous is size and weight. It argues that they were not capable of powered flight. Conversely, the professor believes that there are many pieces of evidence that say they could fly. She offers three counter-arguments to demonstrate weaknesses of each presumption provided by the text to negate the powered flight among petrosaurs.
The first paragraph asserts that same as modern reptiles, the pterosaurs should have been cold-blooded. hence they metabolism were too low to generate required energy. In contrast, the professor explains that recent discoveries delineated that the pterosaurs had a dense hairlike cover which resembles fur in current time warm-blooded animals. She adds that they needed to be warm, which means that they were warm-blooded. Consequently, they could afford the required energy for powered flight. This directly rejects the first assumption of the text.
In the next paragraph indicates that pterosaurs were extremely heavy and large in size. therefore they could not flap air. moreover, their wings were not fast enough, and their length hindered them from the flight. The professor contradicts this justification by suggesting that. we know from evidences that their whole weight were low in their size proportion. They adapted to have a hollow bone which made them lighter. This factor could assist them to stay flop in air.
The last paragraph proposes that, fossils evidences showed that pterosaurs’ muscles were not strong enough to help them take off like modern birds. Once again the professor rejects this idea, despite of it that he accepts two legs are not appropriate for taking off. He emphasizes that birds have only two legs, while pterosaurs had 4 legs and it could make them able to take off easily. He continues that recent studies postulated that even largest pterosaurs had no problem for powered flight when they uses four legs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...erosaurs should have been cold-blooded. hence they metabolism were too low to generat...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: hence,
...erosaurs should have been cold-blooded. hence they metabolism were too low to generat...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: large
...hat pterosaurs were extremely heavy and large in size. therefore they could not flap air. mor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 88, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...were extremely heavy and large in size. therefore they could not flap air. moreover, thei...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 88, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: therefore,
...were extremely heavy and large in size. therefore they could not flap air. moreover, thei...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Moreover
...ize. therefore they could not flap air. moreover, their wings were not fast enough, and ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 280, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
... this justification by suggesting that. we know from evidences that their whole we...
^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...no problem for powered flight when they uses four legs.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 12.0772626932 190% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 22.412803532 219% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 312.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28846153846 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72069889888 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 419.366225166 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6651205611 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.5714285714 110.228320801 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8571428571 21.698381199 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 7.06452816374 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419097039207 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115620021461 0.0996497079465 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07573132073 0.0662205650399 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240101497422 0.162205337803 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511001454599 0.0443174109184 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.8541721854 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.0289183223 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.81 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.