Tpo 52 Task 1 colonies
The reading and the lecture are both about creating humans societies in the Moon or other close planets to Earth. The author of the passage feels that there are several good points for this opinion while, the lecturer disputes the claims made in the excerpt. His position is opposite to that of the author of the reading.
First, according to the reading in the asteroids are less gravity in compare with other planets and it is worth for creating colonies. This fact is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that the phenomena lower gravity make many problems on the human health such as decrease bone density and also muscle mass.
Secondly, the author suggests that humans can bring a lot of suitable metals from asteroids. In the passage, it is said that this issue leads to increase the money for the people. The lecturer, however, asserts that there is not any guarantee for this matter.
Finally, the author posits that the colonies could be a good sponsor for supply raw materials. The author contends that it due from easily there and back tripe to other planets. In contrast, the lecturer's stance is this type of the trip is too expensive and it is not affordable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-15 | elaheh eskandari | 71 | view |
| 2020-07-21 | erfan717 | 71 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...ripe to other planets. In contrast, the lecturers stance is this type of the trip is too ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 1373.03311258 71% => OK
No of words: 205.0 270.72406181 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78536585366 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31599975136 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580487804878 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 419.366225166 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3295452099 49.2860985944 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.75 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0833333333 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06452816374 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149547093468 0.272083759551 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505241072911 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046772289323 0.0662205650399 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088287307867 0.162205337803 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243932872664 0.0443174109184 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.2367328918 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.