TPO 53- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of social benefits.
The reading passage and the listening section are both discuss increasing taxes of cigarettes to regulate this unhealthy products. The article proposes some arguments which seem convincing, however, the speaker casts doubt about them. Therefore, the speaker delve into three reasons and examples supporting her arguments.
First of all, the article indicates that raising taxes on cigarettes brings people about purchasing fewer of them. Nonetheless, the speaker disagrees with this viewpoint and argues that high taxes can not bring people be healthier. People, who have smoking, tend to buy unhealthy food and save money to purchase cigarettes. This behavior causes these people being unhealthier.
Secondly, the article mentions about that increasing taxes is fairly financial for every citizens. Nevertheless, the speaker disapproves this statement since this method does not consider different income from the smokers. This approach leads a big burden for the people who is relatively low income.
Last but not least, the article suggests that the raising taxes provides lots of revenue for the government. As a result, it have to be encouraged since this revenue can be used on improving public welfare but the speaker has converse comment. The speaker asserts that this considerable revenue will cause the government rely on it and do not want to loose it. Consequently, the government would not regulate a strict low to ban the smoking because the government require this income.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...nue for the government. As a result, it have to be encouraged since this revenue can...
^^^^
Line 7, column 352, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...overnment rely on it and do not want to loose it. Consequently, the government would ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48051948052 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71006735318 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.7927389143 49.2860985944 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.4285714286 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386439169493 0.272083759551 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12750956264 0.0996497079465 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698301416515 0.0662205650399 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229401046383 0.162205337803 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826405276698 0.0443174109184 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.