TPO 7 Ecocertification for wood companies

Essay topics:

TPO 7: Ecocertification for wood companies

The reading specifies that American wood companies will not use ecologicaly friendly particle for acquiring ecocertification. However, the professor catss doubt on it and explain that these companies eventually will use this method since there are good reasons.
First, based on the reading, since American consumers are exposed to so much advertising, they do not pay attention to the ecocertification lebel and because of that American do not trust in advertising claim. Nevertheless, the professor explains that Americans to not treat all advertisements the same. He believes that American consumers distinguish the independent organization which gave ecocertification. Therefore, they are confident in this organization.
Second, according to the reading, ecocertified wood are more expensive than uncertified wood. Because of that, consumers are more inclined toward wood do not have certificate since it is cheaper. In contrast, the speaker states that people do not pay attention to the price difference value when its low like wood that have certification. In this case, people pay attention to other factor like benefits for environment.
Third, the lecturer asserts that American wood companes sell most of their products in the United States and getting certification is necessary if they sold their products abroad. On the contrary, the author says that American wood companies are in a competition with foreign countries which make it curcial to own ecocertification. If they do not get certification, foregin countries will acquire the American market which has negative effects on wood companies.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'certificated'.
Suggestion: certificated
...e more inclined toward wood do not have certificate since it is cheaper. In contrast, the s...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, third, in contrast, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.01324503311 299% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 243.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64609053498 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2805504433 2.5805825403 127% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567901234568 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.654555703 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.538461538 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211709543994 0.272083759551 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729567724277 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650028868925 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12469758996 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605109151267 0.0443174109184 137% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.8541721854 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.2367328918 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.