tpo 7.1.
The author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the outcomes of ecocertification of the wood company in the United States. While the reading passage lists some factors such as an unworthiness of label for American consumers, the extra cost of products with certification, and the lack of necessity for developments as the reasons why this scheme will not be successful in United State, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into question for the information in the text.
First of all, the professor refutes the first fact of reading part which states that American consumers do not value these kinds of certification since they get used to various fake advertising label. The lecturer mentions that the people separate the fake slogans of company from the globally approved certification. Since this ecocretification possesses an international reputation, they do not treat as same as they treat with the company's artificial advertising claim.
Next, the passage uses the surmise of the expensive cost of these products and the prone of people for cheap prices, will pave the path for the failure of this program in the United States. On the contrary, the lecturer doubts the truth of this claim. As he asserts that the people value the other factors beyond the products prices. Especially, if the ultimate cost of the product is five percent more than the regular products they can neglect this expense and take a concentration of the other benefits and features of products.
Finally, the professor argues the fact of the lack of interest for development in the company while the wood companies do not have the international markets. Meanwhile, the passage presumes this fact as one of the reasons. Based on the lecturer's perspective, this certification promotes the consumer quantities, and this situation, lead to a big competition among the companies to appeal more consumers. Thus, it can be considered as decent motivation for the companies
Consequently, that is how the professor effectively challenges the whole claims made in the article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ecturer doubts the truth of this claim. As he asserts that the people value the ot...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'such as', 'first of all', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.304 0.261695866417 116% => OK
Verbs: 0.0986666666667 0.158904122519 62% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0666666666667 0.0723426182421 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.032 0.0435111971325 74% => OK
Pronouns: 0.016 0.0277247811725 58% => OK
Prepositions: 0.152 0.128828473217 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0186666666667 0.0370669169778 50% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.03422236734 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0106666666667 0.0208969081088 51% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.178666666667 0.128158765124 139% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0106666666667 0.0158828679856 67% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0106666666667 0.0114777025283 93% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2114.0 1645.83664459 128% => OK
No of words: 338.0 271.125827815 125% => OK
Chars per words: 6.25443786982 6.08160592843 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.04852973271 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.363905325444 0.374372842146 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.304733727811 0.287516216867 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.224852071006 0.187439937562 120% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.136094674556 0.113142543107 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03422236734 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514792899408 0.539623497131 95% => OK
Word variations: 53.9259170014 53.8517498576 100% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.7502111507 120% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.3793520544 49.3711431718 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.615384615 132.220823453 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 21.7502111507 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.769230769231 0.878197800319 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 56.4733727811 50.5018328374 112% => OK
Elegance: 3.23636363636 1.90840788429 170% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.167353132093 0.142949733639 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0709071921575 0.0787303798458 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.72185423813 0.631733273073 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.145298091336 0.139662658121 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.497391084286 0.414875509568 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0968594423787 0.0530846634433 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.