TPO INTEGRATED 44
Both the reading passage and the lecture discuss about a European silver coin found in the North America. However, the writer holds a completely different point as the lecturer does. The reading passage proposes three evidences to dispute the truth of the coin as an historical discovery. While the lecturer challenges the statement with three evidences.
Firstly, the writer says that Maine where the coin is discovered is far away from the Norse settlements. There is no obvious connection between them. However, the lecturer refutes this point by offering other forigen objects which were found in Maine. This strong evidence suggests the idea that the Natives traveled around within the North America to collect exotic stuff.
Second, the passage claims that there were no other coins found in the Norse, so the coin were not brought by European. On the other hand, the lecturer argues that the Norse did not live in the North America forever. As a result, the Norse might carry the silver coins to the state and then bring them back to Europe.
Last but not the last, despite the fact that the Native Americans did not use silver coins as money, the Norse still could make use of coins to trade with them. The silver coins are sparkling and shiny. The natives might be attracted by them and use them to make beautiful jewelry such as necklaces.
According to the three evidences above, the lecturer thinks the silver coin is not a historical fake but a true remain.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...of the coin as an historical discovery. While the lecturer challenges the statement w...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, so, still, then, while, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85317460317 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27212602849 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519841269841 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5819764947 49.2860985944 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5333333333 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 21.698381199 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454826505813 0.272083759551 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150477043063 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893048035055 0.0662205650399 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255059713707 0.162205337803 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679344987481 0.0443174109184 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.3589403974 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.