tpo integrated 48
The lecture and the reading both discuss the decline in the frog’s population. The reading states that there are three ways to solve the problem of extinction in frog population. And the lecture refutes, saying that each of the method provided in the reading has a problem and the reading not offer a practical solutions.
First of all, the reading argues that frog’s population decline due to the use of the pesticides. If there is a law prohibits the farmer from using pesticides in an area where frogs live, thus we can prevent the frog’s population from extinction. The lectures opposes this point saying that a law prohibits the farmer from using pesticides is unfair and not economical. According to the professor, farmers are competing to have more crops, if strict rules are applied to some farmers and not applied to others, sever disadvantage will happen and the farmer will got a lower yield and this is not fair.
In addition, the reading states that some fungus caused disease to the frogs, which lead to the decline in the frog population. Applying treatment to the frogs on a large scale will solve the problem. The lectures counters this point stating that applying the treatment is not easy and expensive. It needs to capture and apply the treatment to each frog individually. Furthermore, applying the treatment will not prevent the disease to spread to the offspring.
Lastly, the reading makes an argument that decline in the frog population due to the destruction of the natural habitat. Lake and marches should be protected. However the lecture disagrees. It claims that global warming is the main cause of the extinction of frogs and many other animals. Moreover, protecting the lakes and the marches from human use will not solve the problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 317, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'solution'?
Suggestion: solution
...m and the reading not offer a practical solutions. First of all, the reading argues...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 271, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'oppose'.
Suggestion: oppose
...opulation from extinction. The lectures opposes this point saying that a law prohibits ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 573, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'get'
Suggestion: get
...vantage will happen and the farmer will got a lower yield and this is not fair. ...
^^^
Line 8, column 216, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'counter'.
Suggestion: counter
...e will solve the problem. The lectures counters this point stating that applying the tr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 160, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
.... Lake and marches should be protected. However the lecture disagrees. It claims that g...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, thus, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.01324503311 319% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04362416107 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67145499149 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44966442953 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8408180338 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4117647059 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379984014416 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133928878044 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940335154004 0.0662205650399 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237468442521 0.162205337803 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623638821917 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.