TPO integrated task 40
The reading and the lecture are both about the reasons that humans might land on Venus and survive. As opposed to, the lecturer who counters-argues that viewpoint, trying to prove that these three reasons do not seem convincing.
First and foremost, the writer mentions that the atmospheric pressure at Venus' surface is greater than the pressure at Earth's surface. So, it is impossible for the spacecraft to land there. On the contrary, the professor cannot disagree more, reasoning that humans should not necessarily land. They could stay up in the air where the atmosphere pressure is lower than on the surface of the Venus. Therefore, they can explore just by creating a spacecraft that can stay like a balloon.
The second argument the author gives is that the water and the oxigen is not available at Vanus. Consequently, people who are staying there cannot survive without water. However the lecturer cannot be more outraged, explaining that are other components such as sulfure and carbon dioxide from which they can create chemical reactions that can produce water. As a result, they do not have to export water from Earth.
Lastly, on one hand, the passage points out that it is very little sunlight present on Venus. Humans would need that to generate electricity for their machines and equipment. Nevertheless, the professor declares that since the sunlight can get through clouds, it is possible that humans can collect direct and indirect light from the clouds. So, clouds can also, reflect the sunlight at certain level that is enough for spaceman to power their cell.
In conclusion, although, the text suggests three reasons in supporting the impossibility of landing on Venus, the lecturer believes that none of them are persuasive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ing there cannot survive without water. However the lecturer cannot be more outraged, e...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, lastly, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 12.0772626932 157% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1393728223 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61328222963 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574912891986 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4831212014 49.2860985944 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1875 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9375 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350934024006 0.272083759551 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102839092254 0.0996497079465 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596308330481 0.0662205650399 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160357072791 0.162205337803 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740485224892 0.0443174109184 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.