TPO - writing integrated task
Summarise the points made in the lecture. Be sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage - a project with a team of people
The reading passage and the lecture are both about approaching new projects with a team of people. The lecturer completely refutes the arguments in the article. He argues that these explanations are faulty.
Firstly, the lecture states that when a company decided to attack its new project to a teams or groups to accomplish it. They, after six months, realize that no rewarding for members of the team was given since the names’ people who made real contributions to the project were not cited. This directly opposes the reading passage that states that members have chance to shine and have their contributions recognized by the team.
Secondly, the lecturer believes that the project did not move quickly mainly because there was not a consensus of opinions inside the groups of how they had to approach the project and decisions. This idea disagrees with the articles that states that the group can work more quickly because a group of people has a wider range of knowledge, expertise and skills.
Finally, the lecturer explains that usually in the groups two people became influencer over the rest member. They were able to drop some ideas, convince the group to agree with them or ignore other ideas. The reading, on the other hand, states that all member have voice in making decisions and the group spreads the responsibility of a wrong decision in the entire group not in individual members.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a team' or simply 'teams'?
Suggestion: a team; teams
...ny decided to attack its new project to a teams or groups to accomplish it. They, after...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1181.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00423728814 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52133598759 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576271186441 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5786403424 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.363636364 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27272727273 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16695503823 0.272083759551 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.062677810509 0.0996497079465 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539019617667 0.0662205650399 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101210163634 0.162205337803 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365388798475 0.0443174109184 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.