tpo12
The author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the accuracy of the actual owner of portrait. While the reading passage uses some reasons that the real possessor of the portrait is Jane Austen the well-known writer, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information in the text.
First of all, the professor refutes the family members' approval after some decades, which in the reading part is nominated as one of the strong reason for its outlook. As the professor states this picture was printed in 1882, 70years after Austen's death, consequently, those family members had not seen her by themselves. As a result, their permission and certification are based on the vague information, and it does not fortify the hypothesis.
Next, the passage uses the fact of similarities among two pictures of Cassandra's sketch and the portrait; inasmuch as, although, in one of them the woman is a teenager and in the other she is an adult, these two are identical; so, the owner of them is Jane Austen. However, the lecturer doubts the truth of this claim. As he asserts the Austen family is a large family, and Jane had a lot of cousins who were in her age. Thus, the owner of the portrait can be one of these family members. Especially, he mentions two distant nieces as the possible owner of portrait.
Finally, the professor argues that the real painter of the portrait is Ozias Humphrey. Meanwhile, in the passage presumes that the style of this portrait is related to Humphrey style who worked at the period in which the Jane was a teenager. Based on the lecturer's evidence, the clothing used for the picture was sold solely by W.Leg. Besides, Leg did not sell this kind of clothing in England till when Jane was 27 years old. Hence, the owner of that teenager portrait cannot be that young Jane.
That is how the professor logically challenges the claim made in the article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 331, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Leg
...ed for the picture was sold solely by W.Leg. Besides, Leg did not sell this kind of...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'kind of', 'as a result', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.283068783069 0.261695866417 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.124338624339 0.158904122519 78% => OK
Adjectives: 0.042328042328 0.0723426182421 59% => OK
Adverbs: 0.037037037037 0.0435111971325 85% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0291005291005 0.0277247811725 105% => OK
Prepositions: 0.140211640212 0.128828473217 109% => OK
Participles: 0.026455026455 0.0370669169778 71% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.51526698175 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00529100529101 0.0208969081088 25% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.166666666667 0.128158765124 130% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00529100529101 0.0158828679856 33% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.015873015873 0.0114777025283 138% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1948.0 1645.83664459 118% => OK
No of words: 337.0 271.125827815 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78041543027 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.04852973271 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.329376854599 0.374372842146 88% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.255192878338 0.287516216867 89% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.181008902077 0.187439937562 97% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0890207715134 0.113142543107 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51526698175 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522255192878 0.539623497131 97% => OK
Word variations: 55.0037756691 53.8517498576 102% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0529801325 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0625 21.7502111507 97% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6937754222 49.3711431718 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.75 132.220823453 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0625 21.7502111507 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9375 0.878197800319 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 46.5817878338 50.5018328374 92% => OK
Elegance: 2.36111111111 1.90840788429 124% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.772229366028 0.549887131256 140% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.151523313293 0.142949733639 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0676535153783 0.0787303798458 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.655934512685 0.631733273073 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.168550098902 0.139662658121 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.384834255651 0.266732575781 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137330515341 0.103435571967 133% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.484676716189 0.414875509568 117% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.02924613981 0.0530846634433 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.563575776694 0.40443939384 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927239330379 0.0528353158467 175% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.26048565121 235% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.62251655629 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 8.0 3.1766004415 252% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.