I agree with lecturer that the new method of product promotion called "buzzing" is appropriate and I think the comments given in reading about buzzing is not true and they are lack of some substantial information about buzzing method.
First, the buzzers is not just paid advertisers. Companies find people who use their products and are pleased with their functions and usefulness as their buzzers and hire them. So buzzers do not give incorrect information or do not suggest a product in spite of they do not believe in. So in this promotion approach buzzers are not a artist just reads a dialogue and
get paid.
Second, in comparison of TV or print advertisement, people in buzzing promotion ask more question about product and challenge buzzers. According to lecturer's experience as a buzzer people claim many questions in their conversation with him about phone service he uses.
Finally, buzzing method has positive effect on social relationships and civilization. because when people accept buzzer's advice about using the product and get pleased they will trust more and honesty between them will be improved. In fact people appreciate buzzers because of their suggestion and information sharing about a specific service or product.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...this promotion approach buzzers are not a artist just reads a dialogue and get ...
^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e not a artist just reads a dialogue and get paid. Second, in comparison of TV...
^^^
Line 8, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
... social relationships and civilization. because when people accept buzzers advice about...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, so, i think, in fact, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 1373.03311258 77% => OK
No of words: 200.0 270.72406181 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.305 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.04702891845 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94784243134 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 419.366225166 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 8.23620309051 12% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5992798301 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.1 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375639602906 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148155291459 0.0996497079465 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468424820377 0.0662205650399 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22462795643 0.162205337803 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387611991598 0.0443174109184 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.