TPO24

Essay topics:

TPO24

The reading passage claims that hardly scientist can study bones and its tissues through animal's fossils owing to the fact that they have become replaced by mineral. In order to do so, scientists decide to investigate Dinosaur's bones, which might reveal remains of blood vessels, red blood cell, collagen and other informative materials inside the bones. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.

First, the author contends that breaking fossilized bone represent some channels with hollows, which contain blood vessels with soft, flexible substances inside the channels. On the contrary, the lecturer brings up the idea that the soft and flexible tissue inside the bone might be something else, not substances that revealed soft tissues. In fact, after an organism is died bacteria colonized hollow and when living inside the bone, they lived behind traces.

Furthermore, the author holds the idea that availability of spheres represent remain of the red blood vessel have been investigated through microscopic analyzing. Conversely, the professor underlines the fact that identical spheres of other animals have been found on other sites and places. So, they have probably different origins, which show pieces of reddish mineral cells.

Finally, as set forth by the author, scientist have found through a test that bones contain collagen. In contrast, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that no one could found the remains of collagen in recent years owing to the fact that they are older than 100,000 years, which cannot last for many years. Indeed, collagen does not come from T. rex and also human skin contains collagen as well. So, it is not probable to think of collagen as a component of bones tissues.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, in contrast, in fact, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 288.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22569444444 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41376891643 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604166666667 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.184376816 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 21.698381199 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441877333387 0.272083759551 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140573807391 0.0996497079465 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781217142638 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246579700715 0.162205337803 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527603697284 0.0443174109184 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.