Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The author of the issue highlights that it is incumbent upon the government to enact flexible laws in order to protect wilderness area. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general argument on this issue. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that protection of these areas not only can be helpful to the entire world and human beings but also can be useful for many species that extinction threatens their presence. The aim of this essay is to put forward some cogent reason to shed light on a number of issues in this framework.
To commence with, the earth has been developed enormously with the advent of sophisticated technology. Parallel to this, greenhouse effect, deforestation, drought, contamination of water and so forth, are the fatal consequences of human activities that put the world in a vulnerable situation. Broadly speaking, these harmful activities definitely have deleterious effects on the wilderness areas and it is the responsibility of nations to take them into consideration. As a vivid example, if the government neglect enacting laws, we will soon witness more destructive behaviors by human beings like erect buildings in these areas. Wilderness areas are the essence and territory of any given country and the government should bend over backward to preserve them successfully. To elucidate more on this issue, if the government pass the buck and does not legislate useful laws to protect wilderness, we would wait for a barren desert.
Another salient point in corroborating my viewpoint is the fact that wilderness areas are the home of vast majorities of animal species. If we take a minute to ponder over it, not only can flexible laws preserve wilderness areas but also can protect crowds of species especially endangered species. Arguably, these species are the inseparable part of our wilderness area and destruction of these territories could have pernicious effects on the life of myriads of species. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that flexible laws not only will preserve such important areas but also will protect the habitat of many different species.
However, what was alluded to above can't be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with the innumerable benefits, it has, indisputably, the law should be flexible enough to let the human beings make the best use of these areas. As a tangible example, there are hundreds of hungry mouth in the different part of the world like some African Countries. So, the government should permit these people to use these lands for agricultural purpose and plant crops, rice and so forth. In this way, not only can hungry mouth feed themselves but also can be beneficial for the government and provide an opportunity for them to accumulate a hoard of money, finally, make the economy prosperous. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal viewpoint.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 654, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...as but also will protect the habitat of many different species. However, what was alluded t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
.... However, what was alluded to above cant be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alo...
^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, however, if, so, broadly speaking, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2563.0 1977.66487455 130% => OK
No of words: 503.0 407.700716846 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09542743539 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94083836506 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502982107356 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 815.4 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9598768668 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.047619048 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9523809524 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90476190476 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15107856682 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460777869647 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392075477797 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0782788616772 0.150856017488 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449808177126 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 86.8835125448 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.