The reading and the lecture are about a dinosaur skeleton fossil founded in China. The author of the reading provides three hypotheses to prove that Sinosauropteryx had not feather. However, the lecturer of the audio refutes those rationals and states three opposite assumptions for it.
First of all, the reading claims that the fine lines might be formed during the volcanic activity, so these lines did not indicate that Sinosauropteryx was a feathered dinosaur. The professor rebuts this point by saying that there was no such indication found to other animal fossil but this fossil. He also states that volcanic activity acted alternately to preserve feather allusion. As a result, these fine lines imply that Sinosauropteryx had feathers.
secondly, according to the writing, since many animals fossil showed such fine line because of their frill, these lines might be for frill of their body. On the other hand, the lecturer posits that even though there is a similarity between frill and feather, unlike feather, fossils of frill do not have beta-carotene which is the main chemical composition of a feather. Moreover, the fossil of that animals has beta-carotene. So, this indicates that these fine lines are a frill.
Thirdly, the writer avers that location of the fine line on the body of Sinosauropteryx indicates that those part did not have any function for the animal by resembling with other species. Conversely, the professor states that the location of feather does not indicate that those had not any function, rather these had some specific function; display function. He further informs that some bird-like pick crews have the same feather at their tails to display themselves. So, these fine line must be the main part of their body.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...s to prove that Sinosauropteryx had not feather. However, the lecturer of the audio ref...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
... that Sinosauropteryx had feathers. secondly, according to the writing, since many a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...y, according to the writing, since many animals fossil showed such fine line because of...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17832167832 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69564093 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517482517483 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2274232115 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.7333333333 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0666666667 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373786637694 0.272083759551 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134930252674 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681990053493 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229285154902 0.162205337803 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753854438291 0.0443174109184 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.3589403974 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.